• strict warning: Declaration of FeedsImporter::copy() should be compatible with FeedsConfigurable::copy(FeedsConfigurable $configurable) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/feeds/includes/FeedsImporter.inc on line 94.
  • strict warning: Declaration of FeedsNodeProcessor::map() should be compatible with FeedsProcessor::map($source_item, $target_item = NULL) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/feeds/plugins/FeedsNodeProcessor.inc on line 319.
  • strict warning: Declaration of FeedsNodeProcessor::setTargetElement() should be compatible with FeedsProcessor::setTargetElement(&$target_item, $target_element, $value) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/feeds/plugins/FeedsNodeProcessor.inc on line 319.
  • strict warning: Declaration of FeedsFeedNodeProcessor::map() should be compatible with FeedsProcessor::map($source_item, $target_item = NULL) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/feeds/plugins/FeedsFeedNodeProcessor.inc on line 227.
  • strict warning: Declaration of FeedsFeedNodeProcessor::setTargetElement() should be compatible with FeedsProcessor::setTargetElement(&$target_item, $target_element, $value) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/feeds/plugins/FeedsFeedNodeProcessor.inc on line 227.
  • strict warning: Declaration of FeedsUserProcessor::map() should be compatible with FeedsProcessor::map($source_item, $target_item = NULL) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/feeds/plugins/FeedsUserProcessor.inc on line 195.
  • warning: preg_replace(): Compilation failed: disallowed Unicode code point (>= 0xd800 && <= 0xdfff) at offset 1809 in /home/writezil/public_html/modules/search/search.module on line 334.
  • warning: preg_replace(): Compilation failed: disallowed Unicode code point (>= 0xd800 && <= 0xdfff) at offset 1809 in /home/writezil/public_html/modules/search/search.module on line 334.
  • warning: preg_replace(): Compilation failed: disallowed Unicode code point (>= 0xd800 && <= 0xdfff) at offset 1809 in /home/writezil/public_html/modules/search/search.module on line 334.
  • warning: preg_replace(): Compilation failed: disallowed Unicode code point (>= 0xd800 && <= 0xdfff) at offset 1809 in /home/writezil/public_html/modules/search/search.module on line 334.
  • warning: preg_replace(): Compilation failed: disallowed Unicode code point (>= 0xd800 && <= 0xdfff) at offset 1809 in /home/writezil/public_html/modules/search/search.module on line 334.
  • warning: preg_replace(): Compilation failed: disallowed Unicode code point (>= 0xd800 && <= 0xdfff) at offset 1809 in /home/writezil/public_html/modules/search/search.module on line 334.
  • You must include at least one positive keyword with 3 characters or more.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 843.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_display::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_display.inc on line 1877.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_display_block::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin_display::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_display_block.inc on line 193.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_broken::ui_name() should be compatible with views_handler::ui_name($short = false) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_field.inc on line 641.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_sort_broken::ui_name() should be compatible with views_handler::ui_name($short = false) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_sort.inc on line 82.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 585.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 585.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter_broken::ui_name() should be compatible with views_handler::ui_name($short = false) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 609.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter_boolean_operator::value_validate() should be compatible with views_handler_filter::value_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter_boolean_operator.inc on line 128.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_style_default::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_style_default.inc on line 25.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 135.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 135.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 843.
  • strict warning: Declaration of content_handler_field::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/cck/includes/views/handlers/content_handler_field.inc on line 208.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 843.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 843.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 843.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 843.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_argument::init() should be compatible with views_handler::init(&$view, $options) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_argument.inc on line 745.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_argument_broken::ui_name() should be compatible with views_handler::ui_name($short = false) in /home/writezil/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_argument.inc on line 770.

What Matters in Jane Austen? Twenty crucial puzzles solved, by John Mullan

I have loved the works of Jane Austen since I was very young, and find her novels endlessly re-readable. I have never really stopped to wonder why that is. What is it marks these novels out from other works of fiction, that means I can read any of the major six once a year or so, never find them tedious, and always find something new to please me and something old to remind me how much I love them? There is an answer of sorts in this book, mainly because, in an elegant and enjoyable way, its 20 essays make me stop and wonder why and then neatly present me with a plausible explanation.
John Mullan’s essays are based on 20 questions. He is not the first to bring out a book devoted to asking questions about the content of Jane Austen’s fiction: John Sutherland and Deirdre Le Faye in 2005 brought out The Jane Austen Quiz Book, which is much more geeky, has different levels and says jauntily dismissive things like ‘Under 5[/20]? Throw this book across the room and go back to watching TV.’ John Mullan is altogether gentler with his readers, but no less (in fact maybe in his detail even more) rigorous.
There was a taster in the Guardian (where John Mullan writes regular literary journalism,including the Ten of the Best series, and has therefore built up a following) in the form of a quiz: Ten Questions on Jane Austen. This has no marks awarded, no put-downs for those who’ve failed to understand the question. The questions are handily supplied with their answers (no need to ‘turn to page 74′) which give boiled down versions of some of his essays and illustrate his approach.
Mullan poses questions that enable him to pull together evidence from the novels to reveal the nature of Jane Austen’s genius. He contends that she is above all an innovative, even experimental novelist, and the first question he asks, informally, in his introduction is whether she was consciously aware of her originality and had the idea that she was doing something new that would outlive the work of her predecessors and contemporaries. He makes the very interesting point that her particular genius was developed in isolation from any influence other than her voracious reading. She was not part of any coterie, or a member of any formal or informal literary establishment. Her attempts to meet her contemporaries were few, and came to nothing.
Jane Austen worked out entirely for herself how she wanted to make her characters reveal themselves to the reader. She gives, and withholds, information about their emotions, their thought processes and their paths to action or inaction. She had limited tools of expression to narrate emotion and impulse, owing to the social conventions of her age, but she used them to the full and extended them in ways that readers of fiction are now familiar with (though they may not be able to put a name to them). He points out her limitations too, crediting her success to her innovations of style rather than content.
It might be a wrench to think of Austen, the conservative literary genius in a revolutionary age, as an experimental writer, but such she was. This has nothing to do with subject matter: indeed, provide some bare plot summaries of her novels, and they can be made to sound less daring than those of her contemporaries such as Maria Edgeworth or Mary Brunton. Her brilliance is in the style, not the content. Even when it comes to her characters, her success is a matter of formal daring rather than psychological insight. We hear their ways of thinking because of Austen’s tricks of dialogue; their peculiar views of the world are brought to life by her narrative skills.’
Now, this is one of the most succinct explanations I have yet found as to why those who have not read her novels, or tried them and not persisted, may not been affected by the qualities that make her admirers go back to her works again and again. (See below for a common misperception of the audacity of Jane Austen’s novels with regard to sex).
The essays were of variable degrees of interest to me, and so they will be to other readers. They all work by asking a question, then pulling together the evidence from the novels, and from what we know of Jane Austen’s own experience of society, mostly drawn from her surviving letters. As is often the case with a book with this structure, it is a little indigestible to read at a stretch, but an utter delight for Janeites, and I assert potentially persuasive for the unconvinced, to dip into. The questions can be straightforward (What Games Do Characters Play? What Do Characters Read?) or of interest in revealing the social context of the novels (How Much Money Is Enough? How Much Does Age Matter?). Some are based on the author’s insights, and are the sort of questions that switch on a light in the mind of the Janeite reader (Why Is It Risky to Go to the Seaside? Gosh, yes – P&P is crammed with young ladies who are seduced (or the attempt made) at South Coast resorts, isn’t it. And Edward Ferrars contracts his ill-advised secret engagement at Plymouth. And Lucy Steele and Robert Ferrars run away to Dawlish after their elopement (what makes Dawlish so funny, I wonder?) And so on! Which Important Characters Never Speak in the Novels? Now you come to mention it, we only know what Captain Benwick actually says thanks to Richard McCabe on screen, not thanks to reading Persuasion.)
The hoariest, oldest question is of course Is There Any Sex in Jane Austen? Answer: yes, just as much as you might expect, and between the sort of people you might predict. Really. Janeites roll their eyes and wonder whether we really have to go there. But yes – we do: while perfectly sensible (generally) literary journalists like John Crace can assert ‘Even if Jane Austen had been free to to write about sex, it doesn’t seem as if she would have had much enthusiasm for it. The pleasure in Pride and Prejudice is all in the social twists and turns, the will-they-won’t-they-of-course-they-will, with Elizabeth and Darcy’s wedding merely the pay-off’, we do. This was in an article with the title ‘Reader, I shagged him…’ (Unoriginal – Tanya Gold, probably among others, got there first.) Oh good heavens. Of course, Jane Austen could not write like E L James and get published. But what does ‘in want of a wife’ really mean? Having his dinner ordered and his linen taken care of? Wherefore Mr Bennet? Mr Palmer? What were Lydia and Wickham up to between running away from Brighton and being cajoled and bribed into matrimony? As for Mansfield Park – written off because the heroine Fanny Price is so very, very morally upright, the novel is in fact a seething mass of desire, vice and adultery, through which she glides, never putting a foot wrong. But virtually every other character among the younger generation does, or wants to. An intelligently argued corrective to this nonsense never comes amiss.
I think this book is a must for all Janeites, but as I’ve been reading it I have been thinking about its potential interest to a wider audience. My personal conclusion is that it is not necessarily going to make much sense to the uninitiated, or cut much ice with the unconvinced, so closely does it rely on a knowledge of the novels for the accumulated detail to make sense. But if anyone is even slightly intrigued to find out what all the fuss is about, it is worth getting hold of if only just for the introduction and the final essay How Experimental a Novelist Is Jane Austen? I have just one real bind with the book – the mimsy, cutesy, almost unreadably bland cover art. How is that going to make it leap off the table in the bookshop of your choice and find itself in your handbag, going home with you? (I read the Kindle ed, however, where that stricture doesn’t really apply). But I highly recommend this book to anyone who has read any Jane Austen, whether as a devoted admirer, or someone who is intrigued by her reputation. This book is highly enjoyable, easy to read (literary criticism by stealth) and will certainly add greatly to the enjoyment of reading Jane Austen’s novels of genius again.
John Mullan: What matters in Jane Austen? Twenty crucial puzzles solved. London: Bloomsbury, 2012. 352 pp.
Also available in Kindle and EPub DRM editions. Paperback edition due January 2013

"I'm astounded by people who take 18 years to write something. That's how long it took that guy to write 'Madame Bovary,' and was that ever on the best-seller list?"
Sylvester Stallone

Random picks

  • While different people use LinkedIn for various purposes, most utilize it for professional reasons such as to form an alliance of people from the same industry or even to look for a job. It is an excellent place for such activities with its huge user base of more than 100 million people from numerous industries and scores of companies. To fully tap the tremendous potential of this highly useful tool, the best thing to do is to get more LinkedIn connections. To make perfect use of this social networking site, it is advisable that you try and increase your visibility by building up more and...
  • A lot of what I do involves helping writers give readers what they expect, and what readers expect has changed over the years.  Many modern novels include sex scenes or language that would have gotten them banned sixty or seventy years ago.  Movies and television have made readers less patient with leisurely story development than they used to be. Even little things like tolerance for –ly adverbs has evolved over time. But it’s worth looking at the principles of storytelling seem to hold steady, even while others shift with the culture.  These editorial constants are a way to understand what...
  • It’s the time of the year when a trip to the mailbox means finding a cheerful bundle of Christmas cards from family and friends all over the world. And it’s this time of the year that I most miss an annual ritual: receiving a Christmas cat card from my dear pen-friend Lloyd Alexander, the great [...]
  • Why the fascination with dragons? Why the dragons dipping and diving in the parchment of old maps, pins folded into the oceans' corners? Why the hundreds if not thousands of dragons printed on paperback covers? Why the dragons that decorated...
  • An American in Oulipo: The Harry Mathews Symposium The Conversions by Harry Mathews. Dalkey Archive Press. 192pp, $11.95. Published in Issue 29 Harry Mathews’ first novel, The Conversions, first appeared in 1961, serialized across the first three numbers of Locus Solus, the journal edited by John Ashbery, Kenneth Koch, James Schuyler, and Mathews himself, which, though it was published in Switzerland, codified New York School poetry. The Conversions stands apart from the rest of the contents of that publication: although no shortage of prose poetry was published in Locus Solus, The...

Recommended sites

Most recent titles

Fast fact about writing

Recently, the writer and neurologist Alice W. Flaherty has argued that literary creativity is a function of specific areas of the brain, and that writer's block may be the result of brain activity being disrupted in those areas.